Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court?

Question: Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court? [UPHJS 1995] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a… Read More »

Update: 2022-02-24 02:48 GMT
story

Question: Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court? [UPHJS 1995] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court?] Answer No, application of review does not lie in such a case...

Question: Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court? [UPHJS 1995]

Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Application for review of judgment | Does an application of Review lie in a case where the judgment is rendered erroneous by virtue of a subsequent judgment of Supreme Court?]

Answer

No, application of review does not lie in such a case – ‘Explanation’ attached to Rule 1 Order 47 (Application for review of judgment).

This question is related to ‘Explanation’ attached to Rule 1 of Order 47 which deals with an application for review of the judgment.

The relevant ‘Explanation’ speaks that the fact that the decision on a question of law on which the judgment of the court is based has been reversed or modified by the subsequent decision of a superior court in any other case, shall not be a ground for the review of such judgment.

In view of the Explanation attached to Rule 1 of Order 47 of CPC, it is clear that an application for review would not lie in a case where the judgment has been rendered erroneous by virtue of the subsequent judgment of supreme court.


Important Mains Questions Series for Judiciary, APO & University Exams

  1. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – I of X
  2. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – II of X
  3. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – III of X
  4. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – IV of X
  5. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – V of X
  6. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VI of X
  7. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VII of
  8. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VIII of X
  9. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – IX of X
  10. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – X of X

Similar News

Bar of Suits