A is alleged to have committed the murder of B. The F.I.R. was lodged against A when inquest report had been prepared by an A.S.I. Should the trial court rely on the F.I.R.? Give reasons in support of your answer.

Question: A is alleged to have committed the murder of B. The F.I.R. was lodged against A when inquest report had been prepared by an A.S.I. Should the trial court rely on the F.I.R.? Give reasons in support of your answer.

Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [A is alleged to have committed the murder of B. The F.I.R. was lodged against A when inquest report had been prepared by an A.S.I. Should the trial court rely on the F.I.R.? Give reasons in support of your answer.]

Answer

In criminal cases, including murder trials, the First Information Report (F.I.R.) is a crucial document that often serves as the initial information and basis for commencing an investigation. However, whether the trial court should rely solely on the F.I.R. in a murder case, particularly when an inquest report has also been prepared by an Assistant Sub-Inspector (A.S.I.), requires careful consideration of the facts, circumstances, and the reliability of both documents.

Reasons why the trial court should or should not rely on the F.I.R. in such a scenario:

a. Timely Record of Information: The F.I.R. is typically the first-hand account of the incident as reported by the informant, often recorded immediately after the incident. It captures the initial details of the occurrence, which can provide valuable insights into the events as they unfolded.

b. Basis for Investigation: The F.I.R. usually forms the basis for initiating the investigation into the alleged offence. It can guide law enforcement in collecting evidence, identifying witnesses, and gathering crucial information.

c. Presumption of Truth: There is a general presumption of truth attached to the contents of an F.I.R., given that it is expected to contain an honest and spontaneous account of the incident as perceived by the informant.

Reasons to Exercise Caution in Relying on the F.I.R.

a. Potential Bias or Misreporting: The informant who lodges the F.I.R. might have personal biases or motives that influence the way they present the facts. They might intentionally or unintentionally omit certain details or exaggerate others, which could affect the accuracy of the information.

b. Possibility of Manipulation: The F.I.R. is written by the police based on the informant's oral account. There could be a risk of manipulation or misinterpretation during this process, leading to inaccuracies in the recorded version of events.

c. Inquest Report: The inquest report, prepared by an A.S.I. after an on-site examination of the crime scene and the deceased's body, can provide an independent and objective account of the situation. It might offer a different perspective from the F.I.R. and shed light on physical evidence, which could either corroborate or contradict the initial account in the F.I.R.

In conclusion, while the F.I.R. is an important document that initiates the legal process and provides a starting point for investigations, it should not be the sole basis for making determinations in a murder trial. The trial court should consider both the F.I.R. and the inquest report, along with other pieces of evidence and witness testimonies, to arrive at a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the events. The potential biases, inaccuracies, or manipulation in the F.I.R. underscore the importance of a thorough and impartial examination of all available evidence before reaching a verdict.

Important Mains/Long Questions for Judiciary, APO & University Exams