Haryana Judicial Services 2013 Mains Previous Year Paper (Criminal Law)

Candidates preparing for Haryana Judicial Services should solve the Haryana Judicial Services 2013 Mains Previous Year Paper and other previous year question papers before they face Prelims and Mains.

Additionally, it gives an idea about the syllabus and the way to prepare the subjects by keeping the previous year questions in mind. All toppers are mindful and cognizant of the types of questions asked by the HCS, to be aware of the various different tricks and types of questions. This should be done by every aspirant when starting their preparation. It is very important to have an overall understanding of the pattern and design of questions.

Only practising the authentic question papers will give you a real feel of the pattern and style of the questions. Here’s Haryana Judicial Services Mains 2013 Previous Year Paper (Criminal Law).

Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Main Written Examination 2013

CRIMINAL LAW

Time: 3 Hours

Maximum Marks: 200

Instructions:

1. Attempt all the questions in the same order in which they appear in the Question Paper.
2. Marks for individual questions are indicated against each question.
3. Support your answers with relevant provisions and case law.
4. No extra answer sheet will be provided.

---

Question 1

A. The utility of a retracted confession hinges primarily on the judiciousness of the court. Respond with reasons to the statement by referring to the judicial approach towards retracted confessions. (Marks 15)

B. The judicial policy in relation to appreciating circumstantial evidence but is but an exercise in logical precautions. Respond to the statement. (Marks 15)

C. Sarita works in a call centre where she has to work in odd hours. She reaches the office around 10:00 pm. Every night and gets back home around 06:00 am. In the morning. Her officer has arranged for transport service so that she and other employees like her can be safely picked up and dropped back. On 01.03.2012, she received a call at around 3:30 am. From her home that her mother is seriously ill. Though the transport service would have taken her back around 5:30 am. Sarita decided to leave at once and borrowed a two-wheeler from a friend for the same purpose. On her way back on roads which were mostly lonely, she was confronted by a gang of drunk hooligans who beat her up severely and ravished her in their car and then threw her off on the road.

Her colleagues spotted her when they were getting back from the office in the company car around 5:50 am. They were horrified at the scene of a bleeding Sarita lying helplessly on the road. They picked her up and took her to the hospital. Some of her colleagues suggested that Sarita must first go to the police but Sarita did not want to register a complaint fearing a protracted legal proceeding which would put her to public humiliation. She mentioned the identity of one of the perpetrators at Rajesh who works in the office opposite to the call centre. In the hospital, Sarita breathed her last around 6:00 pm the same evening. Enraged at the whole event, a couple of her friends informed the police of the incident pursuant to which Rajesh was apprehended and sent for trial.

1. Under which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, the statements made by Sarita to her colleagues in the car may be relevant?
2. Under which provision of the Indian Evidence Act, the statements made by Sarita by her colleagues in the car will not be relevant? (Marks 20)

---

Question 2

A. “Regulating the nature of the interaction between the accused and the police authorities is at the crux of a developed criminal justice system.” Elaborate on the statement by referring to the guidelines laid down in the case of Joginder Kumar v. State of UP (AIR 1994 SC 1349)

B. “The area covered by Article 20(3) of the constitution and Section 161(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is substantially the same. So much so, terminological expansion apart, Section 161(2) is a parliamentary gloss on the constitutional clause.” Respond to the statement made by the Supreme Court of India in Nandini Satpathy v. Dani (P.L.) and Another, AIR 1978 SC 1025 and comment on the limits on the power of the police to interrogate and on the meaning of the term ‘accused’.

---

Question 3

A. Read the following fact-situations and answer the question below after dissecting the element of ‘crime’ if any: –

1. Cesare D’Souza went to a pub on 02.02.2011 to celebrate his birthday. In course of the celebrations, his friends urged him to have a couple of drinks, which he declined. One of his friends, Remo who was heavily drunk, moved to the edge of the terrace where the party was taking place and told Cesare that if he did not drink, he would jump off the terrace. Cesare immediately took a glass of vodka in his hands and gulped it down. Remo joined the party once again and passed out in ten minutes, but Cesare drank throughout the night. By midnight, he was so drunk that he could barely drive. His friends dropped him at his residence which he shared with his judicially separated wife, Maria. That night, Cesare forced himself on Maria and had intercourse with her. Has Cesare committed any offence?
   Answer with sufficient reasons and cite case-law to support your analysis. (15 Marks)
2. Erricson was a neuro-surgeon in India. Manoj, his patient was suffering from acute neurological disorders which rendered him immobile. Sometime later, Manoj developed severe rashes and wounds on his body due to constant confinement to the bed. Erricson was deeply disturbed by the pain of Manoj and told himself that putting an end to the life of his patient would be better than watching him struggle through so much pain. Thinking this, he removed the life support system around Manoj and stopped injecting the regular medicines to his body. Within five days, Manoj died.
   Is Dr. Erricson guilty of any crime under the IPC? (15 Marks)

---

Question 4

A. Garima Rathore was married to Randhir Rathore for five years. At the time of marriage, both the families were aware that Garima had a borderline personality disorder, which was not insanity of any degree, but rendered her personality extremely sensitive. She was being treated for the same although, except her ultra-sensitive nature, she was perfectly normal. One evening Garima was chatting with her friends over the phone when her mother-in-law shouted very loudly in a harsh voice and ordered her to report at the kitchen immediately. That night, her mother-in-law also told Garima that she was no match to her son, Randhir.

Garima was very upset and when she told to same to Randhir, he told her that she should not spend a lot of time chatting over the phone. The next day, Randhir’s mother told Garima to go back to her house as she found her unbearable. She spoke ill of her parents and even told Garima that her parents should have gifted their ancestral home in Jaipur to Randhir. Unable to tolerate this, Garima went to her room and consumed some poison. Currently, she is battling for her life in the ICU of a reputed hospital.

Are Randhir and his mother guilty of any offence under the IPC? Substantiate your answer with adequate reason(s). (15 Marks)

B. One fine morning, three friends, Ranjan, Dheer and Anand sat down to discuss their future. They were all unemployed and thinking of different ways to earn their livelihood. At his juncture, Dheer told just that they should rob a bank. Instantly, Ranjan and Anand agreed, thinking that he was serious. Although Dheer was a bit shocked, he realized that with the help of his friends, he could make a lot of money. So, over the next one week, they planned to rob the nearby bank. They brought masks and arranged snacks and were about to order weapons. In the meantime, a neighbor got to know of their plan and informed that police of the same. The three friends were arrested.

Have Ranjan, Dheer and Anand committed any offence? Support your answer with reasons. (15 Marks)

---

Question 5

A. In certain industrial establishment rendering services, a worker met with an accident as a result of which he suffered partial disablement. The authorities declined to pay him full compensation for the loss suffered by him. The concerned trade union took up the cause of the worker and Raghavan, the trade union leader urged all workers to go on strike. While the strike was in progress, few workers decision to pelt the concerned officer.

Around 20 workers along with Raghavan were arrested for injuring an executive officer and damaging several cars during the pelting process. Raghavan insisted that although he was participating in the strike, he had nothing to do with the pelting. It was, later on, found that the strike itself was illegal as the general requirements of giving notice, etc. were not adhered to.

Can the 20 arrested workers along with Raghavan be said to be guilty of Criminal Conspiracy? Substantiate your answer with sufficient reason and case laws.

B. The Criminal Law (Amendment Act), 2013 has substantially changed the law in relation to sexual offences in India. Point out the amendments effected by the Act and how the earlier provisions in relation to Rape were inadequate? (10 Marks)

C. Write short notes on any three of the following: – (15 Marks)

1. Difference between knowledge, Intention and Motive.
2. Inchoate Offences.
3. Difference between Wrongful restraint and Wrongful confinement.
4. Non- compos mentis.

---

1. Law Library: Notes and Study Material for LLB, LLM, Judiciary and Entrance Exams
2. Legal Bites Academy – Ultimate Test Prep Destination