✕
Home>
![Admin Legal Bites Admin Legal Bites](https://www.legalbites.in/h-upload/2023/02/28/725136-legal-bites-hd.webp,https://www.legalbites.in/content/servlet/RDESController?command=rdm.Picture&app=rdes&partner=legalbites&sessionId=RDWEBTGFUKNPNYGJVRARHN9RYP15RSL1WFIL0&type=7&uid=https___secure_gravatar_com_avatar_8479e0cf3454a649627113916e8319a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g)
Admin Legal Bites
Legal Bites Study Materials correspond to what is taught in law schools and what is tested in competitive exams. It pledges to offer a competitive advantage, prepare for tests, and save a lot of money.
![A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. The cow had been sold by B to C. A brings a suit against C for recovery of the cow and produces the judgment against B in support of his claim. Is the judgment relevant? Give reasons for your answer. A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. The cow had been sold by B to C. A brings a suit against C for recovery of the cow and produces the judgment against B in support of his claim. Is the judgment relevant? Give reasons for your answer.](https://www.legalbites.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evidence-Mains.png)
A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. The cow had been sold by B to C. A brings a suit against C for recovery of the cow and produces the judgment against B in support of his claim. Is the judgment relevant? Give reasons for your answer.
by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 3:13 AM GMT
![A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A’s wife…court convicts B for adultery…C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A’s lifetime. C pleads that she was never the wife of A. Is the judgment against B in the former case relevant against C in the latter case? A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A’s wife…court convicts B for adultery…C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A’s lifetime. C pleads that she was never the wife of A. Is the judgment against B in the former case relevant against C in the latter case?](https://www.legalbites.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evidence-Mains.png)
A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A’s wife…court convicts B for adultery…C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A’s lifetime. C pleads that she was never the wife of A. Is the judgment against B in the former case relevant against C in the latter case?
by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 3:09 AM GMT
![Explain fully with the illustration that “oral evidence must in all cases be direct.” Explain fully with the illustration that “oral evidence must in all cases be direct.”](https://www.legalbites.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evidence-Mains.png)
Explain fully with the illustration that “oral evidence must in all cases be direct.”
by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 2:57 AM GMT
![Distinguish between public and private documents. How are they proved? Distinguish between public and private documents. How are they proved?](https://www.legalbites.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evidence-Mains.png)
Distinguish between public and private documents. How are they proved?
by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 2:06 AM GMT
![Is a document of title, which is more than 20 years old and the basis of the suit, admissible under Section 90 of the Evidence Act? Would it not be correct to say that sub-Section (2) of Section 90A inserted by the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, overrides Section 90? Is a document of title, which is more than 20 years old and the basis of the suit, admissible under Section 90 of the Evidence Act? Would it not be correct to say that sub-Section (2) of Section 90A inserted by the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, overrides Section 90?](https://www.legalbites.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Evidence-Mains.png)
Is a document of title, which is more than 20 years old and the basis of the suit, admissible under Section 90 of the Evidence Act? Would it not be correct to say that sub-Section (2) of Section 90A inserted by the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, overrides Section 90?
by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 1:55 AM GMT