M.P. Judicial Services Exam Mains 2017 Previous Year Paper II | Article and Summary Writing
Candidates preparing for MP Judicial Services should solve the M.P. (Madhya Pradesh) Judicial Services Mains 2017 Paper-II
Candidates preparing for M.P. Judicial Services should solve the M.P.(Madhya Pradesh) Judicial Services Mains 2017 Paper-II and other previous year question papers before they face Prelims and Mains.
Additionally, it gives an idea about the syllabus and the way to prepare the subjects by keeping the previous year's questions in mind. All toppers are mindful and cognizant of the types of questions asked by the MPCJ, to be aware of the various different tricks and types of questions. This should be done by every aspirant when starting their preparation. It is very important to have an overall understanding of the pattern and design of questions.
Only practising the authentic question papers will give you a real feel of the pattern and style of the questions. Here’s Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services Mains 2017 Previous Year Paper (Article and Summary Writing).
M.P. Judicial Services (Civil Judge) Mains Examination 2017
PAPER II (ARTICLE and SUMMARY WRITING)
PAPER II (ARTICLE and SUMMARY WRITING)
Question 1
Write an article in Hindi or English, on any one of the following social topics: [30 Marks]
i. Demonetization
ii. Child Labour
Question 2
Write an article in Hindi or English, on any one of the following legal topics: [20 Marks]
i. Right to Privacy
ii. Medical Negligence
Question 3
Summarize one of the following English/ Hindi passage: [20 Marks]
Sitaram and Sonabai are the father and mother of Ram Prakash. The marriage of Geeta daughter of Ishwarbai and Nanuram was solemnized with Ram Prakash on date 10.10.2013. Geeta was subjected to harassment and cruelty by her husband Ram Prakash and father in Law and mother in law, on the pretext that she was not well versed with household work, her parents had taught her nothing and also that she did not bring sufficient dowry with her. On 14.05.2014 at about 06 A.M. her mother-in-law Sonabai sprinkled kerosene oil over her body and set her ablaze by throwing a matchstick. As a result entire body of Geeta was severely burnt. Her neighbour Manoj first took her to the police station where ASI Rajesh Singh scribed her report. Thereupon a case under Section 498A and 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code was registered.
Geeta was immediately sent to District Hospital Rampur where she was admitted for treatment. At 8:40 A.M., her dying declaration was recorded by ASI Rajesh Singh in the hospital. Thereafter at 9:10 A.M., another dying declaration was recorded by the Executive Magistrate Shri Lalji Meena. On the next day, Geeta succumbed to her injuries. Accordingly, the case was converted to one of murder.
D.S.P. Shri Naveen Kumar, after conducting inquest proceedings, in the presence of panch witnesses Mohan, Halke, Ashish, Ganesh and Ramkumar, Sent the dead body for postmortem. Autopsy surgeon Dr Devendra Sahu found 3rd to 4th-degree burns on her body and in his opinion, the cause of Geeta’s death was shock due to burn injuries.
Investigating officer Shri Yashpal Sharma, in the presence of Panch witnesses Vishnu and Wahid, inspected the spot and seized the burnt skin, hair, clothes etc along with the container of kerosene, after completing the investigation, a Chargesheet was filed against the accused for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 304B and 302 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rampur who committed the case to the Court of Session for trial.
Question 4
Translate the following 15 sentences into English:- [15 Marks]
1) एक ही व्यक्ति दावेदार तथ उल्लंघन करने वाले वाहन का स्वामी दोनों नहीं हो सकता है ।
2) यदि अभिलेख पर प्रत्यक्ष त्रुटि है तो राजस्व प्राधिकारी भी उनके आदेश का पुनर्विलोकन कर सकते है ।
3) तुम बहुत भाग्यशाली हो कि तुमको इतनी अच्छी पत्नी मिली ।
4) कुछ समय के लिए पौराणिक विषय हिंदी सिनेमा पर हावी रहे ।
5) जब दो दृष्टिकोण संभव है तब अभियुक्त की ओर झुकाव वाला दृष्टिकोण लेना चाहिए ।
6) मजिस्ट्रेट किसी भी स्तर पर नवीन अन्वेषण या पुनः अन्वेषण हेतु आदेशित नहीं कर सकता है ।
7) एक्स - रे विशेषज्ञ की साक्ष्य के अभाव में छतिग्रस्त को हुई छति की प्रकृति निर्धारित नहीं की जा सकती ।
8) न्यायिकेत्तर संस्वीकीर्ति, कमजोर प्रकृति की साक्ष्य होती है, सम्पुष्टि के बिना स्वीकार नहीं की सकती ।
9) अभियुक्त ने परिवादी द्वारा प्रेषित मांग का सूचना पत्र प्राप्त होने के बाद भी चेक की राशि का भुगतान नहीं किया ।
10) तथ्यों और परिस्थितियों के प्रकाश में आरोपी को दोषी होना पाया गया ।
11) पुलिस इमारत के बहार चोरों का इंतज़ार कर रही थी लेकिन चोर पहले ही जा चुके थे ।
12) शारीरिक यातना की मानसिक छति अधिक जटिल होती है ।
13) हम अपना विवाद निपटाने निष्पक्ष व्यक्ति को कहे ।
14) याची को नियुक्त करने से इंकार करना असंवैधानिक और अवैध था ।
15) अभियुक्त ने यह तर्क किया कि उसके विरुद्ध यह असत्य प्रकरण प्रस्तुत किया गया है इसलिए निरस्त किया जाये।
Question 5
Translate the following 15 sentences into Hindi:- [15 Marks]
1) The landlord would have enough space for his proposed business if the partition is removed
2) Magistrate may require from the respondent to execute a bond, with or without sureties.
3) Court has discretion to proceed jointly or separately against accused persons.
4) He has not left me in a position to show my face to the society.
5) The defendant’s statement is that he was present in the Registry Office with documents of his ownership.
6) The plaintiff was always ready and willing to perform his part of contract.
7) Defendant argued that there was no condition of measuring the land before execution of sale deed.
8) The defendant admittedly agreed to sell the disputed plot for a total consideration of Rs. 25,000/-.
9) In the result, the suit of the plaintiff is hereby dismissed with costs.
10) Talking about the problems is one thing and solving them is another thing.
11) Time passed and the relations continued.
12) The case of plaintiff is not found to be proved on the basis of the principle of preponderance.
13) Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the private defense.
14) He has not executed registered sale deed in his favour after paying the amount.
15) The defendant did not comply with his part of the contract.