A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A’s wife…court convicts B for adultery…C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A’s lifetime. C pleads that she was never the wife of A. Is the judgment against B in the former case relevant against C in the latter case?by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 8:39 AM IST
No fact of which the court will take judicial notice need be proved.” Critically examine this statement and state the facts of which the court must take judicial notice.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 8:29 AM IST
Explain fully with the illustration that “oral evidence must in all cases be direct.”by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 8:27 AM IST
What do you mean by Hearsay Evidence? Why is such evidence generally not admitted? State the exceptions, if any.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 8:23 AM IST
Define and distinguish between primary and secondary evidence. Under what circumstances is secondary evidence admissible in place of primary evidence?by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 8:20 AM IST
Proving a Will | The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of a property basing his right under a registered will and produced a certified copy of the Will (Ex. A/1) will the plaint. Dispose of the argument of the defendant by an order.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:59 AM IST
How a signature or handwriting of a person alleged to have signed or written by him is proved.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:42 AM IST
The genuineness of a signature on a document was a dispute. Parties produced evidence on the point but did not examine handwriting experts…In the appeal, this finding was assailed. Decide and give reasons.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:38 AM IST
Distinguish between public and private documents. How are they proved?by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:36 AM IST
Is a document of title, which is more than 20 years old and the basis of the suit, admissible under Section 90 of the Evidence Act? Would it not be correct to say that sub-Section (2) of Section 90A inserted by the U.P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, overrides Section 90?by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:25 AM IST
“Oral evidence cannot be substituted for the written evidence, of any contract which the parties have put into writing”. Explain and illustrate the principle of exclusion of oral by documentary evidence.by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:24 AM IST
Document as a sale deed | Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [A filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge Amravati alleging that she had purchased the house and made improvements in the house. Being in need of money… Decide the said objection. Give reasons.]by Admin Legal Bites 1 Oct 2021 7:11 AM IST
