How are liquidated damages different from general damages? Are liquidated damages required to be proved?

Question: How are liquidated damages different from general damages? Are liquidated damages required to be proved? [DJS 2010]

Find the question and answer of Law of Torts only on Legal Bites. [How are liquidated damages different from general damages? Are liquidated damages required to be proved?]

Answer

In legal terms, damages refer to the amount of money awarded by a court to compensate a plaintiff for harm suffered as a result of a breach of contract or a wrongful act, such as negligence or defamation. There are different types of damages that can be awarded, including liquidated damages and general damages.

Liquidated damages refer to a specific amount of money agreed upon by the parties to a contract to be paid in the event of a breach of contract. In other words, liquidated damages are a pre-determined amount of damages that are meant to compensate the non-breaching party for losses that are difficult to calculate or prove. Liquidated damages clauses are commonly found in construction contracts, where delays can result in significant financial losses to the parties involved. By including a liquidated damages clause in the contract, the parties can ensure that they are compensated for any delays or breaches that occur.

On the other hand, general damages refer to the amount of money awarded by a court to compensate a plaintiff for harm suffered as a result of a wrongful act, such as negligence or defamation. General damages are not pre-determined and are instead assessed by the court based on the facts of the case and the harm suffered by the plaintiff. General damages can include compensation for pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of income, and other non-monetary losses.

The key difference between liquidated damages and general damages is that liquidated damages are pre-determined and specified in the contract, while general damages are assessed by the court based on the facts of the case. Liquidated damages are meant to provide certainty and predictability to the parties involved, while general damages are meant to compensate the plaintiff for harm suffered as a result of the wrongful act.

It's important to note that liquidated damages clauses are only enforceable if they are reasonable and reflect a genuine attempt by the parties to estimate the losses that would be suffered in the event of a breach. If the liquidated damages clause is found to be a penalty, rather than a genuine estimate of losses, it may be unenforceable. On the other hand, general damages are not subject to such limitations and are assessed by the court based on the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

While both liquidated damages and general damages are types of monetary compensation awarded in legal proceedings, they differ in their nature and purpose. Liquidated damages are pre-determined and specified in the contract, while general damages are assessed by the court based on the facts of the case. Liquidated damages are meant to provide certainty and predictability to the parties involved, while general damages are meant to compensate the plaintiff for harm suffered as a result of the wrongful act.

Are liquidated damages required to be proved?

While liquidated damages are a pre-determined amount of damages that are meant to compensate the non-breaching party for losses that are difficult to calculate or prove, they are still subject to certain legal requirements. In order for a liquidated damages clause to be enforceable, it must be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss that would be suffered as a result of the breach and not a penalty.

If a liquidated damages clause is found to be a penalty, it may be unenforceable. The court will typically consider whether the amount of liquidated damages is extravagant or unconscionable in comparison to the loss that would be suffered, or whether the clause was imposed as a deterrent rather than a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

In other words, even though the parties have agreed upon a specific amount of damages in the contract, the court will still examine whether the liquidated damages clause is reasonable and reflects a genuine attempt to estimate the losses that would be suffered in the event of a breach. If the court finds that the liquidated damages clause is a penalty, it may refuse to enforce the clause, and instead award general damages based on the actual loss suffered by the non-breaching party.

Therefore, while the parties may agree on a specific amount of liquidated damages in the contract, the clause will still need to be proven to be a genuine pre-estimate of loss in order for it to be enforceable.

• Law of Torts - Notes, Case Laws And Study Material
• Law Aspirants: Ultimate Test Prep Destination