Why are Quasi-Judicial Bodies Important?

This article delves into the importance of quasi-judicial bodies by focusing on how their efficiency contributes to the legal system and the protection of citizens' rights.

Introduction

The Quasi-judicial body is not a part of the formal judiciary but still holds a vital position in legal and administrative areas. It plays a major role in providing specialized and effective mechanisms for dispute resolution. It is also known for its unique service that complements the court system.

We can also consider it as the right hand for all the courts, as it functions for people, their welfare, the government, policies, various sectors and the protection of innocent people.

What is a Quasi-Judicial Body?

A Quasi-Judicial Body is a specialized entity or organization that performs adjudicative functions similar to those of a court of law. While it is not part of the formal judiciary, it operates with authority granted by law to resolve disputes and make decisions. These bodies, such as independent arbitrators or tribunal boards, follow procedural rules and principles similar to those of a court, including conducting hearings and making binding decisions.

A few examples of Quasi-Judicial Bodies:

Election Commission of India: Its function is to settle disputes between the splinter group of recognised parties. It can disqualify a candidate who fails to submit election expenses within the specified time.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: An appeal can be filed against the orders of Income Tax Authorities and the Commissioner of Income Tax.

Intellectual Property Appellate Board: It resolves disputes related to copyright registration, assignment and granting licenses and also hears matters that fall under the Copyright Act, 1975.

Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal: Its function is to resolve disputes in the telecom sector. In 2004, its work expanded to broadcasting matters. Later in 2017, matters related to airport tariffs and cyber were also resolved by (TDSAT).

National Human Rights Commission: It has the same powers as a civil court and can summon any person who violates human rights.

Central Information Commission: It serves as a final appellate authority in cases under the Right to Information Act, 2005.

Securities and Exchange Board of India: Its work is to protect the interests of investors, and to promote and regulate the securities market.

Importance of Quasi-Judicial Body

• Workload Reduction: These entities were established to reduce the court burdens to deliver timely justice.
• Specialization: Authorities have expertise in certain areas of law such as financial markets, employment laws, public standards, immigration, or regulation. That leads to the passing of effective judgements.
• Accessibility: Its most important and major factor is that any citizen of India can appeal to such bodies.
• Administrative efficiency: These bodies were made to handle a specific course of action that leads to a streamlined process that doesn’t create burdens and is not time-consuming.
• Efficiency: They are known for delivering speedy justice through streamlined procedures and specialized knowledge
• Protection of rights: Individuals can seek redress for their violated rights. Orders by income tax authorities can be challenged, summons can be given and they also act as a final appellate authority.
• Check and Balance: It ensures that government bodies adhere to the rule of law and contribute to enhancing transparency and accountability by reviewing government actions and decisions.
• Policy Implementation: It helps in assisting the government through the framework of policies by passing effective judgements. Therefore, it results in providing insights to the frame workers.
• Flexibility and Innovation: It can easily adapt to the easiest procedures in comparison to other courts and allow innovative approaches to dispute resolution.

Conclusion

Quasi-judicial bodies are essential for many functions in government, as they handle specialized matters that may not be suitable for traditional courts and their role cannot be eliminated in a well-run state. Its developing and supporting nature proves the making and function of this body wasn’t wrong. Moreover, their support, along with the amendments to the law and policies, ensures justice and accurate legal interpretation of the law.

References